解决使用redis集群时获取发送端口失败的问题
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ public class SendRtpPortManager {
|
||||
|
||||
private final String KEY = "VM_MEDIA_SEND_RTP_PORT_";
|
||||
|
||||
public int getNextPort(MediaServerItem mediaServer) {
|
||||
public synchronized int getNextPort(MediaServerItem mediaServer) {
|
||||
if (mediaServer == null) {
|
||||
logger.warn("[发送端口管理] 参数错误,mediaServer为NULL");
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
@@ -50,17 +50,15 @@ public class SendRtpPortManager {
|
||||
String sendRtpPortRange = mediaServer.getSendRtpPortRange();
|
||||
int startPort;
|
||||
int endPort;
|
||||
if (sendRtpPortRange == null) {
|
||||
logger.warn("{}未设置发送端口默认值,自动使用40000-50000作为端口范围", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
if (sendRtpPortRange != null) {
|
||||
String[] portArray = sendRtpPortRange.split(",");
|
||||
if (portArray.length != 2 || !NumberUtils.isParsable(portArray[0]) || !NumberUtils.isParsable(portArray[1])) {
|
||||
logger.warn("{}发送端口配置格式错误,自动使用40000-50000作为端口范围", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
logger.warn("{}发送端口配置格式错误,自动使用50000-60000作为端口范围", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
startPort = 50000;
|
||||
endPort = 60000;
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
|
||||
if ( Integer.parseInt(portArray[1]) - Integer.parseInt(portArray[0]) < 1) {
|
||||
logger.warn("{}发送端口配置错误,结束端口至少比开始端口大一,自动使用40000-50000作为端口范围", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
logger.warn("{}发送端口配置错误,结束端口至少比开始端口大一,自动使用50000-60000作为端口范围", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
startPort = 50000;
|
||||
endPort = 60000;
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
@@ -69,6 +67,7 @@ public class SendRtpPortManager {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
logger.warn("{}未设置发送端口默认值,自动使用50000-60000作为端口范围", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
startPort = 50000;
|
||||
endPort = 60000;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -76,10 +75,35 @@ public class SendRtpPortManager {
|
||||
logger.warn("{}获取redis连接信息失败", mediaServer.getId());
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// RedisAtomicInteger redisAtomicInteger = new RedisAtomicInteger(sendIndexKey , redisTemplate.getConnectionFactory());
|
||||
// return redisAtomicInteger.getAndUpdate((current)->{
|
||||
// return getPort(current, startPort, endPort, checkPort-> !sendRtpItemMap.containsKey(checkPort));
|
||||
// });
|
||||
return getSendPort(startPort, endPort, sendIndexKey, sendRtpItemMap);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private synchronized int getSendPort(int startPort, int endPort, String sendIndexKey, Map<Integer, SendRtpItem> sendRtpItemMap){
|
||||
RedisAtomicInteger redisAtomicInteger = new RedisAtomicInteger(sendIndexKey , redisTemplate.getConnectionFactory());
|
||||
return redisAtomicInteger.getAndUpdate((current)->{
|
||||
return getPort(current, startPort, endPort, checkPort-> !sendRtpItemMap.containsKey(checkPort));
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (redisAtomicInteger.get() < startPort) {
|
||||
redisAtomicInteger.set(startPort);
|
||||
return startPort;
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
int port = redisAtomicInteger.getAndIncrement();
|
||||
if (port > endPort) {
|
||||
redisAtomicInteger.set(startPort);
|
||||
if (sendRtpItemMap.containsKey(startPort)) {
|
||||
return getSendPort(startPort, endPort, sendIndexKey, sendRtpItemMap);
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
return startPort;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (sendRtpItemMap.containsKey(port)) {
|
||||
return getSendPort(startPort, endPort, sendIndexKey, sendRtpItemMap);
|
||||
}else {
|
||||
return port;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
interface CheckPortCallback{
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user